Why fish porn literally beats out underwater rugby

A pair of procreating eels is more exciting to an underwater photographer with expensive equipment than top athletes battling with everything they have.
Jan Maisenbacher recently reminded me of the story of how we blame other people for not doing a job. The job, in this case, is producing better video and still photography of underwater rugby. How can we get good photography if somebody (Davrell) blames everybody else for not doing what everybody knew anybody could do but in the end nobody did?

In fact, not everybody can take good photos and videos because you have invest in expensive equipment. Skill is also necessary. Pekka Tuuri has both.

Pekka Tuuri prepares to dive. Photo: Juha Mannila

I recently published a story, utilizing two shots by photographer Pekka Tuuri. He took them when he worked at the 2017 European Championships. Reader interest in the story was low. Wanting to figure out why, I contacted Tuuri to talk about the visual impact of underwater rugby:

Question: Hi Pekka, I looked at your photos from the European Underwater Rugby Championships. Some were very nice. Good resolution. I wonder what sort of equipment you had. Did you shoot with a flash?
Answer: I use a full frame DSLR in housing. Strobes are attached to my camera with long arms. Dual strobes at full power and angled straight towards the surface to get reflected ceiling light.

During underwater rugby matches this particular lighting situation can occur to make for dramatic photography. It usually requires a natural light source from a large window. Photo: Pekka Tuuri
Question: How did you come to take photos? Was it a paid assignment? Did you enjoy it? Would you do it again?
Answer: I was on an unpaid assignment. The people that asked me are my friends. Always happy to help friends.

Question: There were only a few photos posted. But you must have taken many more.
(He misunderstood me, thinking I was referring to his entire career and not just the rugby assignment).
Answer: In 25 years about 300,000.
 
Question: What is different for you shooting sports in the pool versus out in nature? Did you get bored with the rugby photos?
Answer: I shoot everything underwater. I like variety. Underwater rugby provided that, but in the pool you can’t get close enough.
A norvég-dán döntő. Fotó: Pekka Tuuri

Question: Should the CMAS photo competitions include sports as a category?
Answer: Well, sports are a niche in underwater photography.

Tess Blennert photographed during the warm up. Photo: Pekka Tuuri

Question: Since people like looking at photos of people, why is there so little interest in underwater sports?
Answer: It really puzzles me. Most of the underwater photography is of nature. All the most well known underwater photographers are nature photographers while in land photography all of known photographers have people as their subject.

Question: What is the explanation?
Answer: Divers don’t look like humans, I guess.

Question: This is your photo, what do you think of it?

European Championships. Women's final. Germany versus Norway. Photo: Pekka Tuuri

Answer: Mediocre, no faces are visible. There are no facial expressions.

Question: When they come up on land they are amazing.
Answer: Yep, that is the fundamental problem. Compare that one with this nature shot that wins hands down.

Question: Death struggle or mating?
Answer: Mating.

Question: What kind of eel is it?
Answer: They are freshwater eels, actually river lamprey.

Davrell: Thank you.

Originally posted on Davrell Tien’s page (UWRugby.org).